Senter v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Plaintiffs’ reliance on the HAMP Guidelines[,] rather than a formula contained in their [agreements with Chase] to provide the terms of their permanent modifications[,] is an improper attempt to assert a private right of action under the HAMP.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).