Sensley v. Albritton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a relative’s mere at-will employment relationship with an agency or law firm representing a party before a district court judge in a particular case is insufficient to require a judge to recuse himself’
• “Courts should take special care in reviewing recusal claims so as to prevent parties from ‘abus[ing] [Section] 455 for a dilatory and litigious purpose based on little or no substantiated basis.’” (first alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).