Fifth Circuit· 9/28/2004
Sensley v. Albritton
Citations
- 385 F.3d 591
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20385
- 2004 WL 2031863
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “a relative’s mere at-will employment relationship with an agency or law firm representing a party before a district court judge in a particular case is insufficient to require a judge to recuse himself’
- “Courts should take special care in reviewing recusal claims so as to prevent parties from ‘abus[ing] [Section] 455 for a dilatory and litigious purpose based on little or no substantiated basis.’” (first alteration in original
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jolly, Davis, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. PerrySupreme Court· 2006-06-28· cited 297×
- Nachshin v. Aol, LLCNinth Circuit· 2011-11-21· cited 126×
- Mathis v. Huff & Puff Trucking, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2015-06-02· cited 108×
- Ginsburg v. Evergreen Security, Ltd. (In Re Evergreen Security, Ltd.)Eleventh Circuit· 2009-06-11· cited 98×
- United States v. WellsTenth Circuit· 2017-10-23· cited 85×
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. City of BoerneFifth Circuit· 2011-09-28· cited 57×
- Ex Parte EllisTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-12-31· cited 42×
- Adair v. State, Dept. of Educ.Michigan Supreme Court· 2006-01-31· cited 39×
- United States v. MartinezTenth Circuit· 2024-02-16· cited 37×
- Matthew Akins v. Daniel KnightEighth Circuit· 2017-07-25· cited 36×
- United States v. BrownFifth Circuit· 2009-02-27· cited 30×
- Lake Eugenie Land & Development, Inc. v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2016-06-02· cited 30×
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-09-14· cited 25×
- Fairley v. HATTIESBURG, MISS.Fifth Circuit· 2009-09-29· cited 24×
- Coulter v. Gerald Family Care, P.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-01-29· cited 22×
- Rodriguez v. Harris CountyS.D. Texas· 2013-08-01· cited 18×
- Foley Bey v. PratorFifth Circuit· 2022-11-17· cited 14×
- In Re: Vazquez-Botet v.First Circuit· 2006-09-20· cited 9×
- Perez v. AbbottW.D. Texas· 2017-05-02· cited 9×
- United States v. NixonDistrict of Columbia· 2017-09-15· cited 9×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 1,932×
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,221×
- Bush v. VeraSupreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 398×
- The Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana v. Harry L. Laws Company, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1982-11-05· cited 322×
- Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense v. Arlo TatumSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 291×
- Abrams v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1997-06-19· cited 233×
- United States v. JordanFifth Circuit· 1995-03-30· cited 210×
- In the Matter of Bradford MasonSeventh Circuit· 1990-10-17· cited 189×
- Travelers Insurance v. Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1994-11-21· cited 181×
- United States of America Ex Rel. David P. Weinberger, and David P. Weinberger, Esq., Individually v. Equifax, Inc. (Formerly Retail Credit Company)Fifth Circuit· 1977-08-12· cited 121×
- In Re Kansas Public Employees Retirement SystemEighth Circuit· 1996-06-11· cited 117×
- In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert IncorporatedSecond Circuit· 1988-11-15· cited 114×
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. TurnbowSupreme Court· 1989-06-05· cited 102×
- Clark v. Calhoun County, Miss.Fifth Circuit· 1994-05-23· cited 63×
- Beatrice Houston, Annie Ruth Manning, Mary Ann Williams v. Lafayette County, MississippiFifth Circuit· 1995-06-16· cited 48×
- Teague v. Attala County, MSFifth Circuit· 1996-08-12· cited 34×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. FordiceFifth Circuit· 2001-05-17· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.