· 4/25/1968
Sennott v. Hawksley
Citations
- 241 A.2d 286
- 103 R.I. 730
- 1968 R.I. LEXIS 855
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- bypassing standing analysis where “there was a substantial public interest in the adoption or rejection of a new constitution”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts, Paolino, Powers, Joslin, Kelleher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.