Skip to main content
· 4/24/1985

Senior Loiza Corporation v. Vento Development Corporation

Citations

  • 760 F.2d 20
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Rule 4.6 “sets out the exclusive method through which a court may obtain jurisdiction over a party solely by way of publication, and any significant failure to comply with its requirements will cause the nullity” going forward
  • construing Mundo v. Fuster , 87 D.P.R. 363 , 371-72 (1963)
  • affidavit stating opinion of plaintiffs counsel that the plaintiff has a valid claim is insufficient to support a Rule 4.5 motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Coffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.