Skip to main content
· 11/16/1917

Sengel v. Pierson

Citations

  • 177 Ky. 780
  • 198 S.W. 1
  • 1917 Ky. LEXIS 639

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “conversion is not the appropriate claim for Plaintiffs to collect the outstanding balance allegedly owed” to them under “the parties’ oral contract”
  • dismissing Unruh Act claim where plaintiffs’ racial discrimination claim 8 contained no allegations evidencing racial bias

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Settle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.