Skip to main content
· 7/20/1994

Seneca v. Bissell

Citations

  • 644 A.2d 1147
  • 274 N.J. Super. 613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the plaintiff could not properly bring a replevin action to recover seized funds after signing an assignment of interest in the property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Michels and Kestin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.