Skip to main content
· 11/13/2015

Seneca Nation of Indians v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Citations

  • 144 F. Supp. 3d 115
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a court may decide whether to stay a case when jurisdiction is unclear because that decision “does not ask the [c]ourt to declare the substantive law”
  • explaining that a “motion to stay, which does not ask the Court to declare the substantive law, presents a non-jurisdictional threshold ground for denying audience to a case on the merits
  • staying an action before agency decision and before determining subject-matter 3 jurisdiction
  • staying an action before agency decision and before determining subject-matter jurisdiction
  • staying an action before agency decision and before determining subject-matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge John D. Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.