Seneca Nation of Indians v. State of NY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judicial estoppel was inapplicable where there was a “change in the legal standard . . . announced by the Supreme Court”
• “[CJollateral estoppel is less favored when the issue to be precluded is a legal one, and least favored when it is one of statutory construction ... ”
• defendants in NIA action included “numerous” private party lessees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).