Skip to main content
· 6/9/2011

Sendra v. Potter

Citations

  • 833 F. Supp. 2d 846
  • 2011 WL 2262921
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Upon timely objection to the Recommended Decision, this Court is required to make ‘a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kendall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.