Senac v. Pritchard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the organization, interested in protecting citizens' rights to be informed of government activity, did not have standing because it made the choice to challenge the defendant's actions and was not attempting to prevent or reverse adverse effects
• “[A]n organization has standing where it is forced to expend resources fo prevent some adverse or harmful consequence on a well-defined and particularized class of individuals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).