· 9/17/2002
Semrau v. Herrick
Citations
- 72 Conn. App. 327
- 805 A.2d 125
- 2002 Conn. App. LEXIS 476
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It may be very seriously questioned whether either of the [beneficiaries] in this case could be regarded as the sole or principal beneficiary as they were to share equally in the estate.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: West
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.