Skip to main content
· 10/15/1887

Semmes v. Patterson, Henry & Co.

Citations

  • 65 Miss. 6

Syllabus

<p>1. Garnishment. Suggestion of Indebtedness. No command for summons. Section 2423, Code of 1880, construed.</p> <p>It is tlie duty of a sheriff, under section 2423, Code of 1880, to summon all persons suggested in a writ of attachment as indebted to the defendant therein, notwithstanding the clerk fail to insert such a command to summon, as required by Section 2422, Code of 1880. Such failure of the clerk cannot defeat the rights of the attaching creditor.</p> <p>2. Same. Return. Sufficiency of to authorize judgment by default. Case in judgment. A return on a summons in garnishment recites, “ Executed personally on S., by</p> <p>reading to him the within writ of garnishment, and summoning him to answmr as this writ directs.” Held, that such return is insufficient to warrant a judgment by default against S.</p>

Judges: Arnold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.