Semaj v. Savelli
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1559
Syllabus
Settlement agreement; motion to enforce settlement agreement; jurisdiction. The parties resolved a tort claim by settlement agreement, the terms of which the court read into the record at hearing, including that the court would retain jurisdiction to enforce the agreement. The court's journal entry failed to reflect the settlement provision concerning the court's ongoing enforcement authority. Case remanded for issuance of a nunc pro tunc order noting that the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement and for further proceedings regarding appellant's motion to enforce the agreement's terms.
Judges: Forbes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.