· 2/11/2010
Seltzer v. Barnes
Citations
- 182 Cal. App. 4th 953
- 106 Cal. Rptr. 3d 290
- 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 313
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the California anti-SLAPP statute establishes a two-part test wherein first the defendant demonstrates that the act is applicable and second the plaintiff demonstrates a likelihood of success on the merits
- attorney’s settlement communications to opposing counsel protected activity under section 425.16
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Simons
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.