Seltz v. Department of Labor & Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Eu because an entity—the Nevada Supreme Court— could enforce the challenged rules
• “Any supposed threat ... by the Commission, and there has never been one, can therefore be seen to be no more than ‘imaginary, speculative or chimerical.’ ”
• \[A] generalized duty to enforce state law or general supervisory power over the persons responsible for enforcing the challenged pro- vision will not subject an official to suit\
• “That necessary ‘connection’ ... ‘must be fairly direct; a generalized duty to enforce state law or general supervisory power over the persons responsible for enforcing the challenged provision will not subject an official to suit.’ ”
• “[A] generalized duty to enforce state law or general supervisory power over the persons responsible for enforcing the challenged provision will not subject an official to suit.” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)
• “[A] generalized duty to enforce state law or general supervisory power over the persons responsible for enforcing the challenged provision will not subject an official to suit.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).