Skip to main content
· 11/12/1982

Selman v. Manor Mortgage Co.

Citations

  • 551 F. Supp. 345
  • 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that because subject loan “was concededly to a corporation, at least in form,” plaintiffs did “not state a claim under TILA,” despite defendants “requir[ing] that they incorporate as a condition to the loan”
  • if a defendant does “not fall under the definition of ‘creditor’ for purposes of TILA . . . no claim thereunder [may be] stated against them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feikens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.