Sells v. Porter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that debtor’s sexual harassment and retaliation could not plausibly be attributed to “benign or reckless intent”
• affirming Bankruptcy Court’s holding that the state trial court’s analogous sexual harassment judgment precluded relitigation of whether the defendant-debtor willfully caused the plaintiff-creditor injury for purposes of Section 523(a)(6) discharge
• “The collateral estoppel doctrine applies in bankruptcy proceedings brought under § 523(a)(6).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).