Skip to main content
· 12/14/1956

Sellin v. City of Duluth

Citations

  • 248 Minn. 333
  • 80 N.W.2d 67
  • 1956 Minn. LEXIS 645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “a particular act may be administrative for the purpose of deciding which branch of the government it comes under but judicial for the purpose of allowing review by certiorari”
  • stating that on certiorari, a court cannot try a matter de novo
  • explaining that “a particular act may contain certain elements of what is ordinarily considered a judicial function and yet constitute primarily a function which may not be exercised by the judicial branch of the government”
  • a particular act may be administrative for the' purpose of deciding which branch of the government it comes under, but judicial for the purpose of allowing review by certiorari

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frank T. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.