Sellers v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• charging document’s identification of child molestation victim solely by initials did not sufficiently identify victim under rule articulated in Dennard, because it could refer to any person with those initials
• charging document’s identification of child molestation victim solely by initials did not sufficiently identify victim under rule articulated in Dennard, because it could refer to any person with those initials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Grube
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-06-03· cited 26×
• Driggers v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-01-27· cited 20×
• State v. Grube
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-05-16· cited 7×
• Cole v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-11-23· cited 3×
• In the Interest of C. W., a Child
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-05-15· cited 3×
• State v. Timothy Grube
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-05-16

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Eubanks
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1977-09-07· cited 150×
• Dennard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-04-28· cited 71×
• Crawford v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1985-05-31· cited 46×
• Wallace v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-01-10· cited 28×
• Irwin v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1903-06-25· cited 21×
• Coalson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-10-05· cited 20×
• Application of VV Pub. Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-07-09· cited 14×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-10-04· cited 13×