Sellers v. Philip's Barber Shop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a]n establishment which caters to the public or by advertising or other forms of invitation induces patronage generally is a place of public accommodation”
• stating that \[a]n establishment which caters to the public or by advertising or other forms of invitation induces patronage generally is a place of public accommodation\
• stating that, “no device whether innocent or subtly purposeful, can be permitted to frustrate the legislative determination to prevent discrimination”
• court order directing barber to cut hair of blacks did not violate Thirteenth Amendment because barber possessed choice of deciding to no longer practice as a barber
• a barber shop is a place of public accommodation because it caters to the public or by advertising or other form of invitation induces patronage generally

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).