Skip to main content
· 3/24/1992

Sellenriek v. Director of Revenue

Citations

  • 826 S.W.2d 338
  • 1992 WL 59674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that if proof of a maintenance check is offered, then compliance with that aspect of the regulation is shown because that is evidence the test was performed according to approved techniques and methods on a reliable machine
  • requiring all contested civil cases tried before associate circuit judges to be recorded
  • \the foundational prerequisites are unnecessary where the test result is admitted in evidence without objection or by stipulation\
  • construing a former regulation set out at 19 C.S.R. 20-30.031
  • regarding the purpose of maintenance checks
  • appeal in “the seventh case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holstein, Robertson, Rendlen, Covington, Blackmar, Thomas, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.