Sellards v. Board of Trustees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• employee’s benefits that were reduced by amount of workers’ compensation payments previously received did not violate article XIII, section 5, because the reduction provisions were already in effect when plaintiff’s benefits vested
• employee’s benefits that were reduced by amount of workers’ compensation payments previously received did not violate article XIII, section 5, because the reduction provisions were already in effect when plaintiff’s benefits vested

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).