Selig v. Pediatric Specialty Care, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that only state officials, as opposed to state agencies, can be sued for prospective injunctive relief and dismissing claims against state agency
• recognizing that only state officials, as opposed to state agencies, can be sued for prospective injunctive relief and dismissing claims against state agency
• recognizing that only state officials, as opposed to state agencies, can be sued for prospective injunctive relief in dismissing claims against state agency
• determining that Supreme Court decision handed down prior to mandate was not intervening
• “Judgment vacated with respect to the individual capacity claims … and case remanded … with instructions to dismiss the appeal as moot with respect to these claims.”
• providers can enforce § 1396a[a][30][A] through 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).