Skip to main content
· 2/11/2009

Seleine v. Fluor Corp. Long-Term Disability Plan

Citations

  • 598 F. Supp. 2d 1090
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52791
  • 2009 WL 377131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering evidence of other light activities as inconsistent with claims of severe and debilitating pain
  • considering evidence of other light activities as inconsistent with claims of severe and debilitating pain
  • finding 13 pain complaints subject to verification by objective medical evidence and the claim administrator 14 is under no obligation to accept them at face value
  • “[N]umerous Courts have concluded that an 5 administrator does not abuse its discretion by requiring objective evidence of an inability to 6 function in the workplace.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Victor B. Kenton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.