Select Specialty Hospital - Denver, Inc. v. Sebelius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for determination “of whether Plaintiffs were justified in relying on CMS’ prior failure to enforce the must-bill policy” (emphasis added)
• “[I]n those instances where the state owes none or only a portion ..., the unpaid liability for the bad debt is not reimbursable ... until the provider bills the State, and the State refuses payment (with a State Remittance Advice).”
• suggesting such a decision would be arbitrary and capricious

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).