Skip to main content
· 10/25/2011

Select Specialty Hospital - Akron, LLC v. Sebelius

Citations

  • 820 F. Supp. 2d 13
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123062
  • 2011 WL 5042021

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating substantial evidence standard only applies to agency findings of fact made after a hearing
  • “Officers are not integral participants simply by virtue of 19 being present at the scene of an alleged unlawful act.”
  • “There is no requirement that an agency ‘select a final rule from among the precise proposals under consideration during the comment period.’” (quoting Sierra 15 Club v. Costle, 657 F.2d 298, 352 (D.C. Cir. 1981))
  • “The agency ‘must cogently explain why it has exercised its discretion in a given manner,’ and that explanation must be sufficient to enable the Court ‘to conclude that the agency’s action was the product of reasoned decisionmaking.’” (quoting State Farm, 463 U.S. at 48, 52)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.