Skip to main content
· 3/7/1979

Selchert v. Selchert

Citations

  • 280 N.W.2d 293
  • 90 Wis. 2d 1
  • 1979 Wisc. App. LEXIS 2667

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, in the context of property division, an expectation that a party would receive a future inheritance was “too remote for consideration”
  • noting the difficulties and lack of predictability associated with valuing defined benefit plans
  • upholding award of 50% of pension receipts to nonemployee spouse as her portion of marital property on the explicit assumption that pension receipts to which employee spouse was entitled would not be altered by additional post-divorce employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Decker, Cannon, Hansen, Reserve

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.