Skip to main content
· 7/14/1986

Selby v. Burgess

Citations

  • 712 S.W.2d 898
  • 289 Ark. 491
  • 1986 Ark. LEXIS 2011

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that an attorney has an absolute privilege to make statements in pleadings regardless of their truth or the existence of actual malice on the part of the attorney so long as the statements are relevant and pertinent to the pleadings
  • while the privilege protects an attorney from litigation it will not make him immune from professional discipline
  • while the privilege protects an attorney from litigation it will not make him immune from professional discipline
  • the privilege does not immunize an attorney from liability for professional discipline
  • the privilege does not immunize an attorney from liability for professional discipline
  • privilege does not immunize attorney from professional discipline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newbern, Holt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.