Sekiya v. Gates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “lists of facts unaccompanied by analysis and completely devoid of caselaw fall far short of” Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a)(8)(A)’s requirement that appellants present their “contentions and the reasons for them” in opening briefs
• dismissing appeal where appellant failed to accurately cite to the record, or provide the appropriate standard of review
• rejecting arguments containing “[b]are assertions and lists of facts 26 unaccompanied by analysis” and “completely devoid of caselaw”
• rejecting objections that contained “[b]are 5 assertions and lists of facts unaccompanied by analysis and completely devoid of 6 caselaw”
• rejecting arguments that contained “[b]are assertions and lists of facts unaccompanied by analysis and completely devoid of caselaw”
• dismissing appeal where appellant failed to 10 accurately cite to the record, or provide the appropriate standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).