Skip to main content
· 11/18/2004

Seketa v. State

Citations

  • 817 N.E.2d 690
  • 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 2310
  • 2004 WL 2609974

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no abuse of discretion where court limited cross- examination of witness on his plea discussions and his rejection of plea agreement
  • “An express agreement requiring disclosure does not exist if a witness testifies favorably in the hope of leniency, and the State neither confirms nor denies leniency to the witness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Baker, Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.