· 11/18/2004
Seketa v. State
Citations
- 817 N.E.2d 690
- 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 2310
- 2004 WL 2609974
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no abuse of discretion where court limited cross- examination of witness on his plea discussions and his rejection of plea agreement
- “An express agreement requiring disclosure does not exist if a witness testifies favorably in the hope of leniency, and the State neither confirms nor denies leniency to the witness.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kirsch, Baker, Robb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.