Seismic Reservoir 2020, Inc. v. Paulsson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exclusive jurisdiction provision of Canadian statute did not divest the district court of jurisdiction to adjudicate claim alleged under such statute
• explaining that when a court determines that a plaintiff “cannot possibly win relief,” “[d]ismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) is . . . proper.” CONCLUSION The Court GRANTS IN PART Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 8
• “[T]he district court must give notice of its sua sponte intention to dismiss . . . .”
• “[T]he district court must give notice of its sua sponte intention to dismiss . . . .”
• A “‘trial court may dismiss a claim sua sponte under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).’” (citation omitted)
• “[T]he district court must give notice of its sua sponte intention to dismiss . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).