Seippel v. Jenkens & Gilchrist, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying New York law and dismissing claims for breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of contract as duplicative of a claim for attorney legal malpractice
• stating, in the context of a professional malpractice action, “our law cannot permit a limitations period to depend on a continuing omission that can go on for decades” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
• dismissing malpractice claims and related claims of negligence, breach of contract, and breach of fiduciary duty as time-barred because the claims were filed more than three years after plaintiffs “received and relied on” the legal advice at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).