Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/11/2023
Seipelt v. Seipelt
Citations
- 231 N.E.3d 563
- 2023 Ohio 4468
Syllabus
The trial court's decision classifying certain banking accounts as marital property was supported by the manifest weight of the evidence, as Husband failed to trace the accounts to his own separate property. The parties' prenuptial agreement did not evince any clear intent of the parties to treat their incomes earned during the marriage as separate property.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Episcopal Retirement Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Industrial RelationsOhio Supreme Court· 1991-08-14· cited 216×
- Fletcher v. FletcherOhio Supreme Court· 1994-03-23· cited 138×
- Gross v. GrossOhio Supreme Court· 1984-06-13· cited 109×
- Casper v. CasperOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-30· cited 26×
- Eckert v. Warren Cty. Rural Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-10-29· cited 6×
- Chaney v. ChaneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-02· cited 6×
- Vanderink v. VanderinkOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.