Skip to main content
· 12/11/2023

Seipelt v. Seipelt

Citations

  • 231 N.E.3d 563
  • 2023 Ohio 4468

Syllabus

The trial court's decision classifying certain banking accounts as marital property was supported by the manifest weight of the evidence, as Husband failed to trace the accounts to his own separate property. The parties' prenuptial agreement did not evince any clear intent of the parties to treat their incomes earned during the marriage as separate property.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When a [s]tate . . . [limits] citizens [in] the exercise of their constitutional rights[,] . . . the federal system is imperiled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Piper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.