Seipel v. International Life Insurance & Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying workers' compensation standards for unequivocal medical testimony and forfeiture of benefits to Regulation 32 claim
• “Regulation 32 was enacted to provide benefits for all employees of the City of Philadelphia in the event they were injured or disabled in the course of their public service.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).