Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America, Inc. v. Nu-Kote International, Inc. And Pelikan Produktions, A.G., Defendants-Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that bankruptcy did not preclude an injunction against a debtor in a patent infringement suit
• noting that a contempt order is final and appealable when the opportunity to purge the contempt has passed and the position of the parties has been affected by the contempt order
• “[P]ro-ceedings that do not threaten to deplete the assets of the debtor need not be stayed.”
• noting that the design need not be aesthetically pleasing
• limiting relief for contempt for infringement to the products originally enjoined

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).