Seidenbender v. Charles's administrators

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that arrest for disorderly conduct is not unconstitutional if person arrested obstructed officers’ execution of their legal duty, and was not based only on comments uttered
• even had the arrest not been valid the juvenile would still not have been justified in violently resisting arrest
• \the actions of the juvenile in biting and striking the arresting officers and in obstructing the execution of their legal duty\ supported adjudication of delinquency
• “the actions of the juvenile in biting and striking the arresting officers and in obstructing the execution of their legal duty” supported adjudication of delinquency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).