Skip to main content
· 6/29/1972

Seidel v. Hill

Citations

  • 264 So. 2d 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Writing attributed to doctor published in quasi-judicial proceedings under Workmen’s Compensation Law held absolutely privileged
  • statements introduced in quasi-judicial proceedings such as worker's compensation proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.