Seidel v. Durkin (In Re Goodwin)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a criminal referral under section 3057(a) is not an ex parte communication
• holding judge’s ex parte contacts regarding court security “would not cause a reasonable person to question the judge’s.impartiality”
• “We find it appropriate to treat the notice of appeal as a motion for leave to appeal....”
• “We find it appropriate to treat the notice of appeal as a motion for leave to appeal. . . .”
• evaluations of bias or prejudice are judged from 21 an objective perspective
• order denying a motion to recuse is reviewed for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).