Seid v. Pacific Bell, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing claim preempted by section 24 25 6 Defendant also argues that a claim preempted by the LRMA may also be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under U.S.C. § 12(b)(1
• Claim preempted by section 301 was dismissed for 12 failure to exhaust remedies under the bargaining agreement, not merely because it was 13 preempted.
• alleged torts of negligence, defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress which arose out of investigation proceedings leading to discharge covered by collective bargaining agreement's grievance and arbitration mechanism and therefore preempted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).