Seibert v. Seibert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a parent's noncompliance with a court order is a circumstance to be considered in a child custody decision
• “[T]he former husband was entitled to the default but the court must proceed to consider the further petition on custody without foreclosing consideration of all relevant factors bearing on the best interest of the children.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Barnett v. Barnett
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-11· cited 19×
• Armstrong v. Panzarino
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-20· cited 12×
• Longo v. Longo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-15· cited 10×
• Rhines v. Rhines
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-10-04· cited 8×
• Dellavecchia v. Dellavecchia
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-04· cited 5×
• Rose v. Ford
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-03· cited 4×
• Rahall v. Cheaib-Rahall
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-22· cited 3×
• McEwen v. Rodriguez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-01· cited 3×
• Sloan v. Sloan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-31· cited 3×
• Crossin v. Crossin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-12· cited 1×
• Engram v. Bryan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-16
• Briscoe v. Briscoe
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-19
• LACIE SHEWMAKER v. JAMES SHEWMAKER, I I I
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-11-01
• Alan Oria v. Shanifer Velastegui
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-12-18