Seibert v. Noble

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• blurring the distinction between actual and legal malice, stating that punitive damages may be awarded upon a showing that defendant acted with “willful and wanton disregard to the rights and safety of another, or that personal spite, hatred, or ill-will existed.”
• “There was no reliance by Seibert resulting in damage to him. The trial court correctly concluded there was no substantial evidence in the record to submit the issue of fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).