Seibert v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting evidentiary use of defendant’s refusal to submit to chemical testing
• privilege against self-incrimination “applies only to evidence provided by a defendant that is of testimonial character”
• “[A] defendant may suppress [blood alcohol test] evidence ... but in return he will lose his license for a time and his decision to suppress that evidence may itself be considered in determining whether he is guilty or civilly liable.”
• decided under part I, article 15 of the State Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).