Skip to main content
· 11/6/1979

Seibel v. City & County of Honolulu

Citations

  • 602 P.2d 532
  • 61 Haw. 253
  • 1979 Haw. LEXIS 159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no special relationship under § 319 because defendant did not have sufficient control over third party
  • special relationship necessary between defendant and either the third person who may threaten harm or the victim, in order to impose duty upon defendant to protect victim.
  • “An actionable duty is generally owed to foreseeable plaintiffs subjected to an unreasonable risk of harm created by the actor’s negligent conduct.” (Citing Ajirogi v. State, 59 Haw. 515, 583 P.2d 980 (1978).)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Ogata, Menor, Marumoto, Kobayashi, Vacancies

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.