Skip to main content
· 2/4/2002

Segura v. Hunter Douglas Fabrication Co.

Citations

  • 184 F. Supp. 2d 1227
  • 12 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1396
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1912
  • 2002 WL 185543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Plaintiff’s FCHR charge letter alleged “continuing discrimination”
  • describing the work sharing agreement between the EEOC and FCHR and noting that the general purpose of that agreement is to divide the labor required to investigate submitted claims between those agencies
  • taking judicial notice of the EEOC 1994 work sharing agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moody

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.