Segelke v. Kilmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he alteration sought to be made . . . must be one to which the parties have earlier assented and which by mistake was either omitted or incorrectly set forth in the final instrument.”
• evidence did not meet this test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).