Segarra v. Segarra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that an appellate court reviews “trial court’s decision on relocation for abuse of discretion”
• noting that- the trial court’s interpretation of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage-and incorporated settlement agreement is reviewed de novo
• determining that there was substantial competent evidence to support the trial court's finding that the quality of life for the mother and child would not improve when the record showed that the mother did not have a job offer in Bryceville, Florida
• approving the denial of a motion for relocation where the trial court found \no evidence that the proposed move would improve the general quality of life for the mother and the child.\
• District court reviews for abuse of discretion trial court's decision on petition for relocation of child
• “A desire to relocate alone, as a matter of law, is not a substantial change in circumstances sufficient to warrant modification of custody.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).