Segar v. Civiletti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Assuming for the purpose of argument that appellants had established a prima facie case using multiple regression analysis, we think that the school district’s rebuttal evidence would have been inadequate to undermine the accuracy or significance of appellants’ statistical evidence.”
• \It has been neither admitted nor proven that Defendants discriminated against Black special agents prior to 1972.\
• \The fact that Defendants choose not to test their hypotheses leaves their criticisms speculative and incapable of rebutting Plaintiffs' statistical showing.\
• “The fact that Defendants choose not to test their hypotheses leaves their criticisms speculative and incapable of rebutting Plaintiffs’ statistical showing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).