Segal v. Emmes Capital, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, “the use of ‘the sale’ throughout the section [at issue] seems to recognize that only one sale need take place”
• held that to waive a right impliedly, the right must be assertable at the time the right is waived
• stating , “the use of ‘the sale’ throughout the section [at issue] seems to recognize that only one sale need take place”
• “Because the Segals validly waived their rights to seek a fair-market-value determination and an offset, it is immaterial whether the Segals raised a fact issue on the three properties fair-market value.”
• “Because [guarantors] validly waived their rights to seek a fair-market-value determination and an offset, it is immaterial whether [the guarantors] raised a fact issue on the three properties’ fair-market value.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).