· 8/25/2003
SEGAL CO.(EASTERN STATES), INC. v. Amazon. Com
Citations
- 280 F. Supp. 2d 1229
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20639
- 2003 WL 22077682
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the “plaintiffs’ fraud claim rests on the fact that defendant misrepresented its intent to fulfill a future promise [and,] [a]s a matter of law, this allegation cannot provide a basis for a fraud claim.”
- “the complaint’s 2 reference to certain ‘representatives’ of defendant is too vague to sufficiently identify the 3 alleged perpetrators.”
- no public interest implicated for breach of contract claim when the plaintiff failed to support conclusory allegation that the defendant’s solicitation of the plaintiff was part of a pattern or generalized course of conduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coughenour
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.