Skip to main content
· 8/25/2003

SEGAL CO.(EASTERN STATES), INC. v. Amazon. Com

Citations

  • 280 F. Supp. 2d 1229
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20639
  • 2003 WL 22077682

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “plaintiffs’ fraud claim rests on the fact that defendant misrepresented its intent to fulfill a future promise [and,] [a]s a matter of law, this allegation cannot provide a basis for a fraud claim.”
  • “the complaint’s 2 reference to certain ‘representatives’ of defendant is too vague to sufficiently identify the 3 alleged perpetrators.”
  • no public interest implicated for breach of contract claim when the plaintiff failed to support conclusory allegation that the defendant’s solicitation of the plaintiff was part of a pattern or generalized course of conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coughenour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.