Seery v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that American citizen could state a cause of action for taking of real and personal property in Austria
• holding naturalized United States citizen was entitled to compensation under the Fifth Amendment for property located in Austria
• rejecting government’s enemy property defense because property belonging to military takings claimant was actually located in friendly territory when it was taken
• rejecting government’s argument that takings claims should be dismissed because private property at issue was located in Austria
• U.S. citizen had constitutional protection when her real and personal property in Austria was seized for use as a U.S. officers' club.
• U.S. citizen had constitutional protection when her real and personal property in Austria was seized for use as a U.S. officers’ club.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).